The Idea of “One Health”; Inter-species Dialogue and Narrative Possibilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68903/vjta.2026.v07i02.05Keywords:
One health, Non Humans, Narrative, Normativity, PersonhoodAbstract
“One Health” has emerged as a novel paradigm addressing issues of human health in terms of its linkages with health of other species in the planet. The most critical element in this paradigm is the acceptance of the fact that there is a strong interrelation between human health and health of other species and the relationship need not always be viewed from an anthropocentric perspective. Others also required to be factored in. There, however, remains the issue of conceptualizing non-human animal and plant health from the perspective of humans not because of not recognition of its importance but because of the what could be called the problem of inter species intelligibility: an issue of cognitive non-commensurability. This is partly due to the special ways in which species constitute their speech and cognitive universe and partly, in this case due also to the inability of humans to understand. The way out of this impasse, as understood in this paper, is to innovate narrative frameworks so as to enable non-human, i.e., animal and plants, voices to find frames to enter into what has been a restrictive and anthropocentric narrative universe so far.
Downloads
References
Ghosh, Amitav (2006) The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. Penguin UK, 2018
Smuts, B. (2006). Between Species: Science and Subjectivity. Configurations 14(1), 115-126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0004.
Smuts, B. (2006). Between Species: Science and Subjectivity. Configurations 14(1), 115-126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0004
Sorabji,Ricahrd (1993). Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Korsgaard, Cristine (1996) Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554476
James, E., & Koenig, N. (2026). Provocations of Tree Ring Narratives: Dendronarratology, Transmaterial Narratology, and the Ecology of Narratives. Narrative 34(2), 193-216. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nar.2026.a991133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2026.a991133
Caracciolo, Marco,( 2020). ” We-Narrative and the Challenges of Nonhuman Collectives”, Style, 54, 1, p. 94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/style.54.1.0086
Fludernick, Monica (2017 ) “The many in Action and Thought: Towards a Poetics of the Collective in Narrative” Narrative, 2017, 2, p.140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2017.0010
Herman, D. (2011). Storyworld/Umwelt: Nonhuman Experiences in Graphic Narratives. SubStance 40(1), 156-181. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sub.2011.0000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2011.0000
Ghosh, A. (2026). Cyno-Racist Colonialism:“Pariah” Dogs,“Dog Cull,” and the State in Colonial India. Journal of Animal Ethics, 16(1), 17-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.16.1.04
Bhaskaran, Theodore. S (2017). The Book of Indian Dogs, Aleph, Delhi, 2017
Narayanan, Y. (2017). Street dogs at the intersection of colonialism and informality:‘Subaltern animism’as a posthuman critique of Indian cities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(3), 475-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816672860
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The references are the data for the text. There are three movies discussed and they too are publicly available.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Batabyal Rakesh (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits
its use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is cited.